Last updated: 29 July 2026
Project Truth International is committed to accuracy, fairness, and accountability.
We welcome corrections, additional evidence, official responses, and complaints concerning material published under our name. All substantive submissions are reviewed in good faith and in accordance with our Editorial Standards.
Corrections
If you believe that a publication contains a factual error, please identify:
- the title and link of the relevant publication;
- the specific statement you believe is inaccurate;
- an explanation of why it is inaccurate;
- the correct information, where known;
- supporting documents, records, or other evidence;
- your name, position, and organisation, where applicable.
A disagreement with the interpretation, tone, emphasis, or conclusions of a publication does not necessarily constitute a factual error.
We may request clarification or additional evidence before reaching a decision.
Right of Reply
Individuals, companies, institutions, and public bodies mentioned in our reporting may submit a response to significant claims concerning them.
A response should:
- identify the relevant publication and disputed statement;
- address the substance of the reporting;
- provide supporting evidence where available;
- clearly identify the person or organisation submitting it.
Project Truth International may publish the response in full, include a fair summary, update the original publication, or publish a separate follow-up where appropriate.
The right of reply does not provide editorial control over our reporting and does not create an automatic right to amendment, removal, or publication of a response in full.
Complaints
A complaint may concern:
- a material factual error;
- misleading presentation or omission of essential context;
- an unfair or inaccurate description of a person or organisation;
- failure to provide an appropriate opportunity to respond;
- unnecessary intrusion into privacy;
- inaccurate or misleading use of images, video, audio, or data;
- an alleged breach of our Editorial Standards.
Please explain clearly which aspect of the publication or editorial process you believe should be reviewed and provide any relevant evidence.
Complaints that do not identify a specific publication, statement, or editorial issue may be difficult to assess.
How to Submit an Enquiry
Corrections, rights of reply, and complaints should be submitted using the details provided on our Contact page.
Please clearly indicate the nature of your enquiry so that it can be directed to the responsible member of our editorial team.
Your message should include:
- your full name;
- your contact details;
- your organisation or position, where relevant;
- the link to the publication;
- the specific passage or issue concerned;
- a clear explanation of your request;
- supporting evidence, where available;
- the outcome you are seeking.
Anonymous complaints may be considered where they raise a specific and verifiable issue, but anonymity may limit our ability to investigate or respond.
Initial Assessment
After receiving a correction request, right of reply, or complaint, we will assess whether it falls within the scope of this policy.
We may decline to pursue submissions that are:
- unrelated to content published by Project Truth International;
- too general to identify the issue;
- abusive, threatening, or deliberately disruptive;
- based solely on disagreement with a legitimate editorial opinion;
- unsupported after reasonable requests for clarification;
- repetitive and already addressed without new evidence;
- intended to reveal or identify a confidential source;
- part of an attempt to improperly influence or obstruct legitimate journalism.
A decision not to pursue a submission does not prevent us from correcting an independently identified error.
Review Process
Relevant submissions are reviewed against:
- the published material;
- the evidence available at the time of publication;
- any new evidence submitted;
- our Editorial Standards;
- relevant editorial records;
- applicable legal and ethical obligations.
The review may involve the author, editor, researchers, legal advisers, or other appropriate specialists.
Where a complaint concerns an individual involved in the original editorial decision, another appropriate member of the editorial team may participate in the review.
The person making the submission may be asked to provide further information. Individuals or organisations affected by the proposed outcome may also be contacted where fairness requires it.
Possible Outcomes
Following review, Project Truth International may decide to:
- make no change;
- correct a factual error;
- clarify potentially misleading wording;
- add relevant context;
- update the publication with new information;
- include or link to a substantive response;
- add an editor’s note;
- publish a separate correction or follow-up;
- anonymise or remove unnecessary personal information;
- withdraw material in exceptional circumstances.
The appropriate outcome will depend on the seriousness of the issue, its effect on the publication, the evidence available, and the public interest.
How Corrections Are Published
Material factual errors are corrected promptly and transparently.
A substantive correction will normally explain:
- what information was inaccurate;
- what has been changed;
- when the correction was made.
Minor spelling, grammar, formatting, or technical errors that do not affect meaning may be corrected without a formal notice.
New information may be added as an update rather than a correction where the original publication was accurate at the time it was published.
We do not silently remove or materially alter significant errors.
Removal and Unpublishing Requests
Project Truth International does not normally remove accurate material solely because it is critical, inconvenient, old, or visible in search results.
Requests for removal are considered in accordance with our Editorial Standards, including the public interest, accuracy, proportionality, privacy, safety, and legal obligations.
Where appropriate, an update, clarification, anonymisation, or removal of unnecessary details may be considered instead of complete deletion.
Timing
We aim to acknowledge substantive submissions within a reasonable period.
The time required for a full response will depend on:
- the complexity of the issue;
- the amount of material requiring review;
- whether additional documents are needed;
- whether other parties must be contacted;
- whether legal or specialist advice is required;
- any safety or source-protection concerns.
We prioritise matters involving potentially serious factual errors, significant harm, urgent safety concerns, or active legal proceedings.
Review of a Decision
If you believe that our response did not address the substance of your complaint, you may request one further internal review.
The request should:
- identify the original complaint;
- explain which part of the decision you dispute;
- provide any new evidence or relevant information;
- be submitted within a reasonable period after our response.
Where practicable, the review will be handled by a person who was not solely responsible for the original decision.
An internal review is not intended to repeat the entire process where no new issue, evidence, or material error has been identified.
Confidentiality
Correspondence submitted under this policy is handled with appropriate care but is not automatically confidential.
We may share relevant information internally or with professional advisers where necessary to assess the matter, protect legal rights, or reach a fair decision.
We will not disclose the identity of a confidential journalistic source through the corrections or complaints process.
Where a complaint, official response, or correction request is itself relevant to the public interest, we may refer to it in our reporting, subject to fairness, privacy, and legal considerations.
Abusive or Threatening Communications
We may restrict or end correspondence that contains threats, harassment, discriminatory abuse, repeated personal attacks, or attempts to intimidate journalists or sources.
Legitimate criticism, strong disagreement, and robust challenges to our reporting will not be treated as abusive merely because they are uncomfortable or critical.
Related Policies
This policy should be read together with our Editorial Standards, which explain the principles applied to accuracy, verification, sources, fairness, privacy, public interest, corrections, and editorial review.
Information about how to contact Project Truth International is available on our Contact page.
Changes to This Policy
We may update this policy as our editorial processes and responsibilities develop.
The current version will always be published on this page.